Reconstruct the sequence
Explore a chronology of agreements, correspondence, and testimony. Keep dates and reported events connected to their sources.
FOR COMMERCIAL LITIGATION TEAMS
Get to the facts.
Prepare the next move.
Agreements, emails, and testimony rarely tell the story in one place. Explore a dispute chronology that connects competing accounts to the documents behind them.
Explore a focused pilot. Document support, outputs, and integrations are confirmed with your team before implementation.
THE SOURCE FILE
Start with
the evidence.
AgreementsSource record
CorrespondenceSource record
TestimonySource record
Organize → Connect → Review
COMMERCIAL DISPUTE CHRONOLOGYFictional sample
One dispute.
Several accounts.
MAY 06
Agreement signedDocument states a June 30 delivery deadline.Supply agreement · p. 8
JUN 18
Schedule change requestedEmail asks to move delivery to July 12.Supplier email · p. 2
SEP 09
Witness recalls a phone callTestimony describes acceptance of an extension.Deposition · p. 14
ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOW · FICTIONAL RECORDSAttorney review required
BUILT AROUND THE WORK
Your practice.
A clearer starting point.
Compare competing accounts
See a written deadline beside a later request and a witness’s recollection. Flag differences for attorney review without resolving them automatically.
Prepare a reviewable first pass
Scope a factual summary around the questions your team needs to answer. Check missing events and source support before using it in case preparation.
JUDGMENT STAYS WITH YOUR TEAM
AI prepares.
Your attorneys decide.
A request to change a deadline is not proof of an agreed amendment. Your attorneys inspect the agreement, locate the response, weigh testimony, and decide what the record supports.
Check the original source.
Verify dates, context, and whether the document supports the finding.
Resolve the open questions.
Correct omissions and unsupported statements. Apply your firm’s review standards.
Approve the work.
Your team reviews and approves the final output before relying on it.
BEFORE THE FIRST CONVERSATION
Good questions.
Clear scope.
Start with a representative agreement, correspondence set, and testimony excerpt. Compare the effort to reconstruct and verify the dispute with your current process.
Discuss your workflow ↗What kind of business litigation workflow can we explore?
A focused factual chronology built from agreements, correspondence, and testimony. We will confirm document support and the work product your team needs before defining a pilot.
Does Workplex resolve contradictory evidence?
The proposed workflow puts competing accounts and their sources beside one another. Your attorneys assess credibility, interpret the documents, and determine their legal significance.
Can we use our existing systems?
Map where documents come from and where reviewed output needs to go. Confirm any connector, manual handoff, or integration work during scoping; the sample is not a confirmed integration.
How do we judge whether the pilot is useful?
Check completeness, source support, and the effort to correct the chronology. Measure reconstruction and review time together before deciding whether to expand.
OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
Explore more solutions.
FOR WORKERS’ COMP DEFENSE TEAMS
Workers’ comp
Bring medical records, physician opinions, and defense preparation into one reviewable workflow. Trace the findings back to the evidence before your team takes the next step.
Explore the solution FOR ACCIDENT & PERSONAL INJURY TEAMSAccident & injury
Incident reports, treatment notes, and bills arrive in separate stacks. Explore a source-linked chronology that brings the event and treatment history into view.
Explore the solutionSTART WITH ONE WORKFLOW
Bring the task
taking too much time.
Let’s discuss your documents, review standards, and a useful first pilot.
Book your demo No client records needed for the conversation.Book a business litigation demo
Agreements, correspondence, and competing accounts in one place.