Connect incident and treatment
Explore a single sequence of reported events, initial visits, and follow-ups, with the supporting records alongside each finding.
FOR ACCIDENT & PERSONAL INJURY TEAMS
From the incident
to the whole record.
Incident reports, treatment notes, and bills arrive in separate stacks. Explore a source-linked chronology that brings the event and treatment history into view.
Explore a focused pilot. Document support, outputs, and integrations are confirmed with your team before implementation.
THE SOURCE FILE
Start with
the evidence.
Incident reportsSource record
Treatment notesSource record
Billing recordsSource record
Organize → Connect → Review
INCIDENT-TO-TREATMENT CHRONOLOGYFictional sample
One incident.
A connected history.
JAN 12
Incident reportedAccount recorded for comparison with the evidence.Incident report · p. 3
JAN 13
Initial treatmentVisit notes document reported neck discomfort.Initial evaluation · p. 6
FEB 07
Follow-up visitTreatment and billing entries share a service date.Follow-up · p. 19; bill · p. 4
ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOW · FICTIONAL RECORDSAttorney review required
BUILT AROUND THE WORK
Your practice.
A clearer starting point.
Surface gaps for review
Check the supplied file for missing visits, repeated documents, and inconsistencies. Distinguish an absent record from a break in treatment.
Bring bills into context
Review service dates beside treatment entries. Your team verifies amounts and the underlying documents before using a summary.
JUDGMENT STAYS WITH YOUR TEAM
AI prepares.
Your attorneys decide.
A chronology records what the documents say. It does not determine fault or medical causation. Your attorneys verify the accounts, review prior history, and assess what the evidence supports.
Check the original source.
Verify dates, context, and whether the document supports the finding.
Resolve the open questions.
Correct omissions and unsupported statements. Apply your firm’s review standards.
Approve the work.
Your team reviews and approves the final output before relying on it.
BEFORE THE FIRST CONVERSATION
Good questions.
Clear scope.
Start with an incident report, a representative treatment record set, and associated bills. Test completeness, source references, and the time spent correcting the chronology.
Discuss your workflow ↗Is this an established off-the-shelf injury product?
This page illustrates a workflow to explore with your team. Confirm supported document types, required outputs, and implementation scope in a focused pilot.
Does the chronology determine fault or causation?
No. It organizes reported events and treatment history. Attorneys evaluate the evidence, competing accounts, and medical opinions before relying on the work.
Can billing records be included in the conversation?
Yes. A pilot can explore connecting billing entries with treatment records. Matching dates alone do not establish payment, reasonableness, or recoverability.
What should we bring to the first call?
Describe your file mix, the chronology you prepare today, and the review steps that take time. No client files are needed for the initial conversation.
OTHER PRACTICE AREAS
Explore more solutions.
FOR WORKERS’ COMP DEFENSE TEAMS
Workers’ comp
Bring medical records, physician opinions, and defense preparation into one reviewable workflow. Trace the findings back to the evidence before your team takes the next step.
Explore the solution FOR COMMERCIAL LITIGATION TEAMSBusiness litigation
Agreements, emails, and testimony rarely tell the story in one place. Explore a dispute chronology that connects competing accounts to the documents behind them.
Explore the solutionSTART WITH ONE WORKFLOW
Bring the task
taking too much time.
Let’s discuss your documents, review standards, and a useful first pilot.
Book your demo No client records needed for the conversation.Book an accident & injury demo
The incident and the treatment, connected into one record.